> Why do you suppose after a year+, the FDA has failed to fully approve their U.S. distributed BioNTech “vaccine”?
Because Pfizer doesn't the liability of a "fully approved" vaccine that doesn't have the liability protection afforded by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act fo 1986.
Those of us who've been paying attention have known about the "legally distinct" deception since last August, when Comirnaty was "fully approved".
I have to agree with you. They desperately need the liability protection. I had heard about the Comirnaty approval last August also but I subsequently read the FDA post saying that BioNTech was approved. They've been very opaque about this issue, clearly attempting to mislead the public.
First, I found out, Pfizer is waiting with Comirnaty for Pfizer shot to be approved for all kids and be placed on the mandatory vaccination schedule. This will give a liability shield, which currently EUA gives. Second, I remember reading somewhere that the EUA Pfizer got is not quite the EUA normally given. Unfortunately, I cannot recall the details but I suppose one should be able to find that out.
Great job summarizing the big picture of our covid virus “emergency”, the EUA approved vaccine “side effects” and our public health agencies’ fraud. I wonder if these agencies have themselves seen the condition of the rope holding their story together.
I suspect our public health agencies are living in the land of denial. They've got their game plan, which has been most successful, so likely they don't worry about such trivial matters. As long as MSM is willing to play along, they've got nothing to worry about unfortunately. Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the Covid heros, wrote a great substack today, with considerable detail of the ivermectin fraud. Anyone wanting to do a deeper dive into this, consider this important information.
> Why do you suppose after a year+, the FDA has failed to fully approve their U.S. distributed BioNTech “vaccine”?
Because Pfizer doesn't the liability of a "fully approved" vaccine that doesn't have the liability protection afforded by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act fo 1986.
Those of us who've been paying attention have known about the "legally distinct" deception since last August, when Comirnaty was "fully approved".
I have to agree with you. They desperately need the liability protection. I had heard about the Comirnaty approval last August also but I subsequently read the FDA post saying that BioNTech was approved. They've been very opaque about this issue, clearly attempting to mislead the public.
First, I found out, Pfizer is waiting with Comirnaty for Pfizer shot to be approved for all kids and be placed on the mandatory vaccination schedule. This will give a liability shield, which currently EUA gives. Second, I remember reading somewhere that the EUA Pfizer got is not quite the EUA normally given. Unfortunately, I cannot recall the details but I suppose one should be able to find that out.
Great job summarizing the big picture of our covid virus “emergency”, the EUA approved vaccine “side effects” and our public health agencies’ fraud. I wonder if these agencies have themselves seen the condition of the rope holding their story together.
I suspect our public health agencies are living in the land of denial. They've got their game plan, which has been most successful, so likely they don't worry about such trivial matters. As long as MSM is willing to play along, they've got nothing to worry about unfortunately. Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the Covid heros, wrote a great substack today, with considerable detail of the ivermectin fraud. Anyone wanting to do a deeper dive into this, consider this important information.
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/fraudulent-trial-on-ivermectin-published?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0NTQ5NTAzOSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NTE0MzI5MzcsIl8iOiJxemljTyIsImlhdCI6MTY1MTU4ODMyMiwiZXhwIjoxNjUxNTkxOTIyLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNjQ1NTI0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.Zo8yA6HlZ_PEHtfZnPmvGrip9nWc2xh-LQWXrSSCiRY&s=r