I have been struggling with the truth of what’s been happening since Covid hit. The Trusted News Initiative created massive censorship of scientific research that essentially prevented our mainstream media from doing their job. Despite that however, there have been numerous opportunities for those in the media to speak out…yet none of them have done so. How do you feel that the FDA is doing everything in its power right now to prevent the Covid vaccine clinical trial data from seeing the light of day. Does that sound reasonable to any of you? What possible motivation could they have other than to conceal the evidence? The FDA wants to take 75 years to slowly release the material rather than the 8 months that a Federal judge determined was reasonable. The FDA is challenging that decision. Keep in mind that our FDA received all the documents from Pfizer over a year ago, so they have it easily available and took 104 days to “carefully” review all the clinical trial data. Why are they unable to send along that material to the highly respected, international scientists and researchers who voiced concerns about the safety of the vaccines, given the high VAERS reports and experiences from their practicing colleagues and thus were seeking an independent review of the material? I can’t even imagine that there is any legitimate case to be made to wait until everyone is dead and gone and the information is no longer relevant. Where is mainstream media now?
https://trialsitenews.com/pfizer-tries-to-join-fda-lawsuit-to-defend-trade-secrets/
Where is mainstream media when one of the most respected peer reviewed journals, the Lancet, voiced concerns about the misinformation that our public health agencies are spewing.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02243-1/fulltext
“In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated, suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist to claim that “the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated for COVID-19”.
“People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together.”
Where were our democratic members of Congress when a Senate hearing, which was called a Second Opinion on Covid, was taking place? A gathering of leading physicians and researchers, even the creator of the mRNA technology, shared their experience with early treatment options and the mountain of scientific research on early treatment interventions, that have been ignored? ALL democrats chose to avoid this critical 5 hour presentation because of who orchestrated it. Senator Ron Johnson is not someone who garners respect from the Democrats, but that in no way should have disqualified the credibility of the invited speakers as each has a resume that clearly proves their scientific achievements and for others, their decades of experience treating critical care patients and more specifically their Covid early treatment patients over the last one and half years. Are we back in high school, or should I say middle school, where an entire group of children could be ignored or mistreated because someone didn’t like one of the kids in the group? Why was noone interested in hearing from highly credible and respected authorities who have NO conflicts of interest, which cannot be said about our public health agencies? Is every democratic senator so afraid of hearing something that is inconsistent with what is being stated by our public health authorities and mainstream media or are they afraid of making their donors unhappy? Shame on all 50 of them. Fortunately there was a dedicated attorney at the roundtable panel who was able to get Covid documents directly from the DOD, with a FOIA request, which clearly paints an alternative reality. I encourage you to go to page 12 and see the glaring evidence clearly- as of this past August, the majority of hospitalized seniors were fully vaccinated.
https://www.justfacts.com/document/waning_effect_covid-19_vaccines_humetrix_2021.pdf
“As Delta variant surged to over 50% in June, COVID-19 hospitalizations more than doubled, reversing the prior trend of decreasing hospitalizations since April ▪ In this 80% vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.”
Isn’t this “senior” population the very people who were to be protected by vaccination? If I hear one more time that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated, I think I’m going to scream. Fortunately this attorney also has 3 whistleblower accounts from high level military physicians who have seen first hand the harm that has taken place during their tenure treating countless soldiers, who have been forced to receive Covid vaccinations, many against their will.
It has been estimated that given early treatment with safe, effective FDA approved generic drugs, which could have legally been prescribed, we would have prevented the deaths of over 500,000 Americans. How can it be that we live in a country that has allowed this level of atrocity to occur? I simply cannot accept that. I cannot live with the possibility that those who are responsible for these crimes against humanity will not be made accountable? This stretches to every first world country’s leadership, their public health agencies and the WHO.
I believe the WHO is ultimately responsible for failing to reveal and confirm the contents of the “home medicine kits” that were distributed to every household, in every village, in Uttar Pradesh, which led to the elimination of the pandemic within a few months time. That protocol should have been sent to every single country in the world. That would have stopped this pandemic in its tracks. Instead, we were told a false narrative, perpetuated by our public health agencies who have profound conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry and ignored by our mainstream media which also has conflicts of interest given who the actual owners of our mainstream are. Isn’t that the very job of our independent media - to do a deep dive into the science and reveal the truth to the American people?
Here was yet another opportunity that has been ignored. Why has not one investigative journalist questioned why we are still continuing EUA of the vaccines, other than Prizer, when more than enough time for full approval should have easily been reached? Our journalist are behaving like the 3 monkeys - seeing no evil, hearing no evil and speaking no evil, except against the Covid vaccines that is. This shouldn’t be a parabol - this is medical censorship at the height of a global pandemic which has crippled the world. Big pharma, on the other hand, appears to be thriving!
If anyone has any suggestions as to how we can impact a change here, please don’t hesitate making your thoughts known in the comment section.
I hear you. This has not happened over the last 2 years of Covid. Remember what the editors in chief of the 2 leading peer reviewed journals have publically stated, some back in 2002.
Dr. Marcia Angell, Harvard physician and editor in chief of the NEJM said:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.”
Dr. Relman, another former editor in chief of the NEJM said this in 2002 - “The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet said:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2). Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma? [Last accessed August 5, 2015]. www.thelancet.com. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf.
They were telling us all quite clearly that the public health agencies, research centers and academic institutions of our country have been captured by the pharmaceutical industry. No one took any action. It is interesting that Richard Horton, then editor of the Lancet, is stil editor in chief and despite his cries of science "turning toward the darkness", HE is continuing to produce tainted science.
I feel your pain - all of us who aren't living in an alternate reality, feel it as well. We thought the Big Lie was a nightmare that was damaging our very democracy. The unnecessary deaths of half a million Americans however is a Bigger Lie I'm afraid.
The Lancet owes the scholarly world an apology. More generally, as you well point out, our institutions of public trust have thoroughly undermined themselves. I am overwhelmed by the range and depth of failure. Which is also the absence of checks and balances, whether academic (research), political, journalistic, or otherwise. We got here so quickly that it must have been long in the making. An erosion. The structures in place weakened, consistently compromised. Then with an additional stressor, the collapse -- the catastrophe. It's honestly like I am walking around in the ruins of the academic and intellectual world I grew up with, grew up in.
The good news, I suppose. Denmark has called the pandemic over. Japan never went in for vaccine mandates, and did allow doctors to treat Covid patients with ivermectin. The USA is not all the world. But I am still struggling to process it all: including and most disturbing the rage and hatred continually expressed by many of my fellow Americans against anyone who does not meet the ever-shifting definition of "fully vaccinated."
If the vaccine were a sterilizing vaccine, I might understand that rage and hatred a bit better. If Dying from Covid (as opposed to "Dying with Covid") presented a serious mortality risk to even a small percentage of the population -- and not a percentage of a percentage, I also might understand that rage and hatred a bit better.
Right now, I'm having trouble grasping it. It truthfully seems like the American public is being manipulated to destructive ends by a predatory elite. I hate conspiracy theories. But I don't know what else might explain it -- particularly since over the past two years, we've seen an immense transfer of wealth from roughly lower 60% percent of society to the upper 2%. But even if this does explain something, and again I hate conspiracy theories, how does that help us? I apologize for presently having no solutions to contribute.