Margret Chan, the previous Director General of the WHO, said in 2015: “I have to take my hat and go around the world to beg for money and when they give us the money [it is] highly linked to their preferences, what they like. It may not be the priority of the WHO, so if we do not solve this, we are not going to be as great as we were”.
Margret Chan, the previous Director General of the WHO, said in 2015: “I have to take my hat and go around the world to beg for money and when they give us the money [it is] highly linked to their preferences, what they like. It may not be the priority of the WHO, so if we do not solve this, we are not going to be as great as we were”.
So now we’ve been informed of the truth. It took the former Director General, whose career wasn’t being jeopardized, to share with the world the current reality. As a result, the WHO is now forced to consider the needs and interests of their funders, which may not always be in alignment with their primary function of doing what is in the best interests of global public health. Trial Site News did another wonderful report about this reality of which we should all take notice.
In the face of a public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, government authorities and international organizations have traditionally looked to the World Health Organization (WHO) for guidance – trusting that the WHO is free of commercial influences. Originally funded entirely by member states, the organization now receives less than 20% of its budget from these states and the rest from donors[iv] with their own financial and strategic agendas.
This is a horrifying reality, to which no one has been listening. We had been poised to give the WHO the most authority ever granted it, over future pandemics, which would essentially limit our rights guaranteed to us by the U.S. Constitution. Although the added amendments to the WHOs proposed document, made by our government, did not pass during this recent meeting, they left the door open to vote again for those restrictive measures prior to the 2024 final vote.
We saw evidence of something similar in medicine when former Editors-in-Chief of two prestigious peer reviewed journals told the tale of the capture of our public health agencies by the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. Marcia Angell, Harvard physician and editor in chief of the NEJM said:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.
Dr. Relman, another former editor in chief of the NEJM said this in 2002
The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet said:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2). Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma? [Last accessed August 5, 2015]. www.thelancet.com. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf.
Once again, no one has been listening. In fact, Richard Horton remains the Editor in Chief of The Lancet and despite his past moment of clarity, he continues to censor urgent scientific research on Ivermectin. That makes him the worst of the group as he was clearly aware of what was happening, but in order to maintain his position, he continued to do the very thing he cautioned us about. Shame on him.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, an amazing physician in the UK, is working hard to alert the world about early treatments for Covid. She co-founded The World Council for Health. She actually has a zoom recording where she challenges Dr. Andrew Hill on his published research paper which essentially trashed Ivermectin. He admits to having been put in a “difficult position” by his employer, while claiming to Dr. Lawrie that he believes Ivermectin is, in fact, an effective drug for the treatment of Covid. He reveals, when pushed, that the conclusions of his paper were written by his employer, who received a payment of millions of dollars in funding from a pharmaceutical company, soon after the research was published. Given that his employer was not a listed author on the paper, it was scientific fraud to allow them to write the conclusions of the paper. So it’s on tape for all to see, yet again, no mention of this from mainstream media. I’m told a legal case is pending where he has been formally accused of scientific fraud. Talk about blood on his hands! While you’re checking out the 12 minute video, take some time checking out Dr. Lawrie and her organization. They are working to provide an alternative to the WHO. They are focused on health/wellness and personal responsibility. Oh what a world we could be living in if an organization such as this one were tasked with insuring global health. It would change the lives of every person, in every country around the globe. Instead of the primary focus being on treating the symptoms of disease, they would be focusing their guidance on improving overall health and wellness before disease takes root. They would work on turning around chronic illnesses rather than simply having patients return to the pharmacy each month for medications that simply treat their symptoms. It would be a medical revolution so to speak. This is what the functional medicine approach is all about, which is growing substantially around the country.
Please help me to understand how this can be happening. We know that mainstream media has failed to report on these urgent topics so the vast majority of Americans are unaware of these profound conflicts of interest to which we find ourselves being subjected. Science is essentially lost. There is no medical integrity left. What the hell can we do?
The Indian Bar Association took an aggressive stand against the WHO a year ago, with almost no attention paid to the case. Their 40 page document is extremely extensive but they did provide a 2 page paper that’s a bit easier to get through. Essentially the case is against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist of the WHO. She is accused of crimes against humanity by ignoring the established science behind Ivermectin and by creating fear about future variants and its potential harm to children, which is scientifically unfounded. The punishment, if the courts determine that she is guilty, appears to be death/imprisonment for life or for extended periods of time.
From the Indian Bar Association document:
1. Running a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin by deliberate suppression of effectiveness of drug Ivermectin as prophylaxis and for treatment of COVID-19, despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data compiled and presented by esteemed, highly qualified, experienced medical doctors and scientists. 2. Issuing statements in social media and mainstream media, thereby influencing the public against the use of Ivermectin and attacking the credibility of acclaimed bodies/institutes like ICMR and AIIMS, Delhi, which have included ‘Ivermectin’ in the ‘National Guidelines for COVID-19 management’
Yet another issue that is being ignored are the VAERS reports which list dramatic numbers of adverse reactions to the Sars-CoV-2 injections. Frontiers in Medicine had posted an article on information about adverse effects reported from December 2020 - October 8 2021. Of the 604,157 cases of adverse reactions to the vaccines at that time, 12.56% had to go to the ER, and 5.96% were hospitalized. Those numbers are higher than the death rate from Covid. The WHO’s vaccine reporting of adverse reactions is filed at vigiaccess.org You will find 3,830,946 adverse reactions reported as of this writing. You will need to type in Covid-19 vaccine to get the information. They don’t differentiate between vaccines for Covid. If you were to add up ALL of the adverse reactions to ALL other vaccines given over the last 50 years, that number would be significantly lower than the 1.5 years the Covid vaccines have been in existence. Shouldn’t that disturb everyone? If that’s not horrible enough, it has been estimated that there is a tremendous under reporting of adverse events, so to get a more accurate number, you would have to multiply those numbers by a factor of 10-40, depending upon whose opinion you trust. Ask any nurse if they have ever filed a VAERS report for any adverse reactions from any vaccine. I have not found even 1 nurse or physician who did so, other than the team I’ve been working with at the FLCCC. Medical professionals are actually required to make such a report but there are no consequences to those who don’t comply so they simply don’t.
The Children’s Health Defense just reported on the most updated VAERS data. Read it and weep.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,287,595 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines that were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 27, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That’s an increase of 9,615 adverse events over the previous week.
VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine events in the U.S.
The data included a total of 28,532 reports of deaths — an increase of 220 over the previous week — and 235,041 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,347 compared with the previous week.
Where the hell is the AMA when you need them? Oh, they’re having wine with their Big Pharma representatives while sunbathing on some delightful beach, paid for by you know who. Where the hell is mainstream media?
So let’s review. Public health funding goes to Big Pharma and academic research institutions. Unfortunately, they have such profound conflicts of interest, that the research that they produce is tainted, as defined by the Editors-In-Chief of leading peer reviewed journals.
When we look at observational data, like in Uttar Pradesh, we can clearly see the impact from the distribution of hundreds of millions of “home medicine kits” and the ending of the Delta variant, no less, within 2 months time. Had those same kits been made available to every household around the globe, for less than $25 mind you, we could have ended the pandemic around the globe in a few months time.
We know that the vaccines are NOT what they were promised to be - “safe and effective”. They fail to prevent infection and transmission and their toxicity has caused countless deaths and more persistent life altering adverse reactions.
We’ve had 3 military whistleblowers sharing data that clearly exposes horrifying, escalating rates of illness within the military - cardiac, neurological, oncological, psychiatric and gynecological to name a few.
Physicians have lost their right to provide informed consent to their patients.
Medical censorship has become the norm.
We are now poised to authorize EUA for our little ones, ages 6 month - 4 years. There is not one documented case of a healthy child dying of Covid, so essentially, the greatest risk to these infants and children will be the vaccines themselves. Unfortunately the pediatricians didn’t object….why risk their financial future for the well being of the children they’re meant to care for.
We have a public health agency, our FDA, that believed it was in the best interest of the public to prevent the full release of the Covid vaccine trials data for 75 years. Thank God a federal judge believed otherwise. New data is being released each month which shows the failures and conflicts of interest within the trials and the disturbingly unprofessional, unscientific and unethical lack of substantive safety data. Pregnant and lactating women were never even a part of any trials, instead feeling comfortable solely relying on pregnant monkey research. Wouldn’t you know it the OBGYN’s thought that was just fine with them also.
The brazen disregard of these issues, any one of which should have been sufficient to stop the madness… except it didn’t… is something that I keep losing sleep over. We’ve come to the point where they don’t even need to be sneaky about what they’ve done and what they’re continuing to do.
Not only am I ashamed to be a Democrat, I’m also ashamed to be an American. This is not the America I knew. Until people wake up and start opening their eyes and seeing what is happening around them, nothing will change. Maybe it’s time to have a meaningful conversation with that family member, colleague or friend, whom you’ve known for many years or your whole life, who you’re certain has never been a conspiracy theorist, and hear what their concerns are. Ask them why they chose not to be vaccinated, despite the social isolation, financial loss through job loss and ridicule that they have had to endure. Maybe they want the same things that the vaccinated want. They want to feel safe. They want this fucking pandemic to end. They want to protect their children, neighbors and family. Maybe we all share the same feelings on this. Maybe a significant portion of these people chose not to be vaccinated because they took the time and had the patience, skills and desire to do a deep dive into the science (and not because of some conspiracy theory), while others chose to trust what they’ve been told by people they thought they could trust. To trust the legacy media reports from evidence based medical journals. To trust our public health agencies. To trust our doctors. To trust our academic institutions. To trust our mainstream media to be the watchdogs of those in authority and power. Would Watergate have been a turning point for Nixon had mainstream media never reported on the break-in? Would Vietnam have come to an end if mainstream media didn’t get boots on the ground and tell the public that we weren’t getting accurate information from our military and government?
Let’s all take a moment and ask ourselves, what can I do to change this scenario? When you figure it out, please share it with us.
I used to think that people who refused medical treatment were foolish, but now, I refuse ALL medical treatment, all the way around. They have earned this refusaL. A doctor that is going along with this is a murderer of the worst kind, a clueless murderer. The movie Angelheart comes to mind; they cannot see they themselves as the murderer, their minds partitioned by the jab.
Hi Michelle, I told you I would give you a shout when I have another dinner party here in Fairview. How can I reach you by email, please?