I’ve been a fan of Ted Talks for many years. When I got an email pointing me to Bill Gates’s April 2022 Ted Talk, which garnered 2,037,304 views at the time of this writing, I was determined to view it. Let me tell you, Bill blew it in my opinion!
Bill makes numerous comments which I found startling. “It’s hard to overstate how awful Covid has been”. Now that’s an interesting conclusion since he must assume some responsibility for the implementation of “vaccines” in this pandemic, which by his own admission, have failed. He goes on to say “We need to live free from fear of the next pandemic”. His agenda however had been to get everyone vaccinated and fear porn was the protocol used to accomplish his mission.
Bill goes on to describe an example of prior successes that our country has achieved. He concludes that “We’ve gotten really good at preventing fires.” Have we Bill? Living in the pacific northwest, we’ve been inundated with history making scorched earth forest wildfires that have destroyed record breaking numbers of acres of trees, animals and botanicals, record breaking losses of homes and businesses, creating more profound air pollution than has happened before in this country. He points out how “well funded and well understood” fire management has been. He sites 370,000 full time firefighters with over 8,900,000 fire hydrants. This is the example he thinks we must implement. “That type of systems is what we need to stop pandemics.” I think not Bill. Unfortunately there aren’t any fire hydrants in the woods.
To accomplish this model, according to Bill, we must invest 1 billion dollars annually to fund the Global, Epidemic, Response and Mobilization (GERM), which would create a group of 3,000 experts standing by to prevent the next potential pandemic disaster. According to Bill, we need to spend billions to save trillions, with Covid-19 cost estimates coming in at approximately 14 trillion dollars. Oh my! Bill explains that we could then stop outbreaks before they become pandemics, if we implement containment measures within the first 100 days.
But wait, here’s the icing on this cake. It would be lead by the WHO. Imagine that. Imagine trusting the WHO yet again to lie, obstruct, and abuse their power as they have done for the last 2.5 years. Let’s not forget, the Bar Association of India has charged 2 Directors of the WHO with “Crimes Against Humanity” after the profound success in Uttar Pradesh last May/June. The WHO even praised the efforts in Uttar Pradesh which distributed “home medicine kits” to 230,000 MILLION people, with the actual assistance of the WHO. They were able to stop the Delta surge within 2 months time.
The WHO has publically spoken out about the reality of their situation. They have stated that they must go around the world, “on bended knee” to capture funding for their programs. They must therefore, necessarily, be considerate of the needs of their donors. What they don’t directly say is that this position is at the expense of the world’s citizens in favor of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the pharmaceutical industry. Decades ago, the largest funders of the WHO were individual countries around the world. That’s not the case today. I do love how they note these donations on their web site.
WHO’s work to protect health is only possible thanks to the contributions made by our Member States and other donors and the collaboration with many institutions and stakeholders.
Reading that statement, one might assume that the “Member States” represent the majority of donations made. A Swiss report notes serious concerns regarding the Gates Foundation’s donations, who are the second largest contributors.
“Most of the funding Gates provides to the WHO is tied to specific agendas of the foundation. That means that the WHO cannot itself set global health priorities, and it is beholden to a largely unaccountable private actor. Unlike states, the Gates Foundation has little democratic accountability.”
Did you read that conclusion? - “The WHO cannot itself set global health priorities and it is beholden to a largely unaccountable private actor…. The Gates Foundation has little democratic accountability”.
I was surprised to see a heavier Mr. Gates who apparently put on some weight during the pandemic. He did seem reasonably confident that his proposal will eventually come to fruition. Now if we can replace the WHO with another organization, like the World Council for Health, we’d be well on our way to dramatically improve the general health of the world and provide effective management of any future pandemics. Had the WHO followed the recommendation of Dr. Tess Lawrie, a founding member of the World Council for Health, we would have ended the pandemic in 2020. Dr. Lawrie has been a respected analyst for the WHO for many years. She provided a 100+ page analysis to the WHO regarding potential treatment for Covid-19. She urged the WHO to provide immediate, mass distribution, for everyone around the globe, of ivermectin. The WHO chose to ignore her conclusions, deciding to wait instead for an experimental gene therapy which would be provided under an emergency use authorization. Thank you Mr. Bill Gates.
I like your attitude and your leanings...
I invite you to listen to this: https://odysee.com/@Daniel:bd/The-Virus-Cover-Story-with-Jon-Rappoport-720:4
Then, if you want more, because the things that I have learned over the past 2 1/2 years have been quite an education!!! -- just let me know. I save a lot of credible people to listen to... Cheers!
If you're not interested in further exploration, I am not one to insist, or to remove my courtesy. xo
Yes indeed, we only ever had to follow the money.