In the 14 century, a monk wrote a book entitled The Cloud of Unknowing. When I read that, I had an aha moment. So many of my Democratic friends and relatives who finally took the time to talk with me about the Covid vaccines and the adverse effects that were disabling countless people around the globe actually concluded that “I don’t know what to believe any more”. The dilemma is clear. As a nation, we’ve been indoctrinated, just like physicians, to believe in the “gold standard” reputation of our public health agencies. It’s almost anti-American to question these pillars of our medical community. Despite that reality, we’ve been told by 3 editors of leading peer reviewed medical journals, who would necessarily know the truth of what happens with scientific research, that our government agencies and academic institutions have been captured by the very industry they were meant to regulate. Essentially the truth is that EBM (Evidence Based Medicine) is not what we believed it to be. Not by a long shot. Large, randomized, double blind trials are designed, and not infrequently, even written by pharmaceutical companies and often paid for by public funds through the NIH and the FDA. Those of us who are familiar with scientific research and statistics however understand that trials can be designed to fail or to show efficacy and that conflicts of interest are rampant in this arena. I’ve provided this information before but it’s important enough for me to include it again, for those new to my substack.
As you likely know, two of the most prestigious journals of medicine are The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
Dr. Marcia Angell, Harvard physician and former editor in chief of the NEJM said:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.”
Dr. Relman, another former editor in chief of the NEJM said this in 2002 - “The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet said:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” - Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?
For those of you who aren’t physicians or researchers, I’d like you to consider the simple truth of what I’m going to suggest. You don’t need advanced degrees or have a genius IQ to consider the evidence before us regarding all things Covid. A few simple questions should help you to clarify the situation. Would you consider establishing care with a physician who you knew had been sanctioned and penalized by their licensing board for multiple infractions and inappropriate medical practices with their patients? Would you continue to frequent a restaurant if you knew that the health department had written them up for frequent and repeated health violations? Would you want to go to a hospital that had been fined and penalized for fraudulent dealings with their patients? I think we can all agree that such evidence should certainly cause us to reconsider our support of such institutions.
Let’s review what we know about Pfizer pharmaceutical. They have been the most fined and penalized of all pharmaceutical companies around the world. They have paid out tens of billions of dollars due to false advertising and inappropriate actions they have taken to encourage the public to buy their drugs. They have shown the world exactly what they’re capable of. The real question is, why isn’t anyone listening? In the case of Covid, I believe the answer is that our formerly esteemed public health agencies have been captured by Pfizer. Rather than regulate their operations, they’ve given them a pass to do whatever they want to do or not do. Operation WarpSpeed provided the cover for them to do so.
We learned this past winter that their Covid vaccines were never tested to determine if they prevented transmission and infection. When the mainstream media and our President went on air saying that if you got vaccinated, Covid stopped with you, Pfizer executives and our public health officials remained silent. Their tacit approval compelled the world to discriminate against the unvaccinated. We can all remember hearing Rachel Maddow and Anthony Fauci telling us that after the first phase of Covid, which was before the vaccines were deployed, the pandemic was continuing due to the unvaccinated. “This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated” as stated by President Biden. Dr. Fauci had to know that a non-sterilizing vaccine would never prevent transmission but he maintained and confirmed the misinformation that we all received. If you still have any doubts, let’s not forget that our FDA went to court to try to prevent the release of Pfizer’s clinical trial data for 50 years. Now why do you imagine they would want to do that? If the clinical trial data was good, they would have been eager to share the details with the public. They could have squashed any hesitancy with sound research data. As you know, that never happened. Pfizer then joined in by taking legal action as well but they requested the release be delayed for 75 years. Now I’m not surprised that Prizer did that but I’ll never understand why the FDA took that action unless it was to protect themselves from their approval of an experimental vaccine that had serious adverse effects, that they were aware of and that they didn’t want the public or physicians to be aware of.
Given all that we’ve learned about Pfizer and our captured regulatory agencies, the NIH, the FDA, the HHS and the CDC, it’s remarkable to me that people still struggle to believe the truth. Corruption has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. When early treatment with safe, effective, off-label, FDA approved drugs were prohibited from use, that insured that people would suffer and die unnecessarily. Is that a conclusion that you’re comfortable with?
Today we’re confronted with the demands of the WHO as they want to be the sole authority in any and all future pandemics. They even want to determine when to call a public health emergency, like they did with Monkeypox. Fortunately the global public never bought into that so Monkeypox slipped from our minds. Had a treaty been signed already, giving them unilateral authority, we would have been forced to do whatever they determined was in our best interest.
Let’s take a transparent look at the WHO and what we already know about them. They actually publicly shared their policy regarding their donors and the position that the WHO finds itself, in relation to those donors. They stated that they go around the globe, “on bended knee” to beg for donations. They actually went on record saying that they therefore had an obligation to support the mission of their donors over the needs of the global public. In addition to that clearly stated reality, the Indian Bar Association has sanctioned the WHO for “Crimes Against Humanity” for their refusal to mass distribute ivermectin, following their success of ending the Delta variant crisis within 3 months time in Uttar Pradesh. Now I ask you, is that an organization that we should feel comfortable with? Is that an organization that we should hand over our constitutional rights and personal safeguards to? For me, the answer is remarkably easy. It’s a hard NO! Should the U.S. allow any foreign authority to determine what is in our best interest? I say no! Should any unelected authority be allowed to overrule the Constitutional safeguards we have enjoyed for centuries? Again I say, hell NO!
I was delighted to hear that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has announced he’s running for President. His vast experience over the last 3 decades as an environmental activist has provided the evidence of what he’s been able to accomplish. Having won over 500 lawsuits against environmental polluters, he knows only too well the conflicts of interest that have plagued our EPA and FCC. More recently, he has been calling out the crimes that have occurred since the pandemic. By employing the science of “psyops”, they have learned that by using a simple term, they can turn countless people away from Kennedy with little effort. This plot is achieved by referring to Kennedy as an “anti-vaxxer”, so they have succeeded in branding him as an undesirable candidate. The truth is, he was never an anti-vaxxer. He was a man who merely asked repeatedly for the safety data on childhood vaccines. Since there was no such data ever accumulated, Big Pharma learned that they could control the narrative by simply calling him an anti-vaxxer. This trick works to create unconscious cognitive biases that are highly effective. It certainly initially worked with me as well, as I had dismissed his book, The Real Anthony Fauci for that very reason. Despite the fact that I was aware of his remarkable environmental activism, I had initially refused to read his book until a trusted and highly respected colleague, Dr. Pierre Kory, encouraged me to read it.
Robert Malone does an excellent job of describing this process that he calls “5th Generation Warfare”.
5th-Gen warfare is an extension of Asymmetric and Insurgent Warfare strategies and tactics, whereby both conventional and unconventional military tactics and weapons are incorporated and deployed, including exploitation of political, religious and social causes. This new gradient of warfare uses the internet, social media and the 24-hour news cycle to change cognitive biases of individuals and/or organizations. It can be conducted by organized or unorganized (ergo decentralized) groups; it may be led by nation states, non-nation state actors and organizations, non-governmental organizations or even individuals. A key characteristic of 5th-Gen warfare is that the nature of the attack is concealed. The goal is to disrupt and defeat opponents by creating new cognitive biases.
The most effective 5th-Gen warfare strategies employed by those lacking integrity are not purely based on pushing false narratives, mis- dis- or mal- information. The most effective strategies mix truth with fiction, and act to increase confusion and disorder in the thoughts and minds of those being targeted, so that they are not sure what or whom to believe.
Regarding the thorny issue of the childhood vaccine schedule, I urge everyone to read the first chapter of Turtles All The Way Down. Eight Israeli scientists chose to publish their research anonymously to insure that they wouldn’t lose their reputation or their jobs. The bottom line is that we’ve all been lied to for generations. This belief in the value of vaccinations has been ingrained in all of us by sophisticated propaganda. Fortunately, the pandemic nightmare has caused an awakening among large segments of the population who have resisted the call to get boosted. Better late than never my friends. Parents with young children are even questioning the sacrosanct childhood vaccination schedule. Although an unintended consequence, it’s encouraging to me that parents are finally taking a hard look at the information that is becoming available about the lack of safety data in all vaccines in that schedule.
So when you’re questioning who to believe, I hope you’ll consider the evidence that I’ve shared. It’s easy to understand, and simple to conclude. We have been lied to. We have been censored. We have allowed countless human beings to die unnecessarily from a virus that could have been easily treated with existing off-label, FDA approved drugs that have decades of remarkable safety statistics. Instead, such life saving treatments were prevented from being prescribed and doctors were both censored and censured and many lost their license to practice medicine. That’s the price they paid for their bravery in trying to save their patients. Can you be equally brave and do a deep dive into Robert F. Kennedy Jr? I believe he is the person who we’ve been waiting for. He’s the person who understands the profound conflicts of interest that have infected our agencies and prevented them from doing the jobs they were tasked with. It’s the first time, in a very long time, that I feel hopeful for America. I was in 7th grade when JFK was assassinated. I remember how the country felt about this young, Catholic President and the unique positions that he took. His premature death was a tragedy that has never been fully investigated. Conspiracy theories continue to abound. In the blink of an eye, his brother was next to be assassinated and yet again, we’ve never fully understood how that could have happened. But both happened and history will never know the true impact of the loss of these innovative men and what they each could have accomplished. I hope we have the courage to see what Robert F. Kennedy Jr can and will do if we’re able to get him elected. He’s got my vote. What about you?
I’ll be spending the weekend in Texas, attending the 2nd annual education conference put on by the FLCCC entitled Emerging Approaches to Treating Spike Protein-Induced Diseases. Continuing education credits are available for physicians and nurses. I believe there are still a handful of tickets left so if you’d like to educate yourself about Covid, the spike protein and effective treatments for Long Covid and vaccine injuries, this is a must attend event.
Please let me know if you’ll be attending as I’d welcome the chance to meet up there.
He's spitting truth, and people are AFRAID of that...
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1650550341027475479?s=20
Great article Michelle. You make a great case for how clear this should be for people, but obviously there are still too many that don’t see it as clearly as you lay it out. Another point that maybe is not as clear to most people, is the long standing history, and reasons, for the normally lengthy development process for drugs and vaccines. All previous vaccines have always taken 7 - 10 years in order to adequately prove safety and efficacy. These mRNA vaccines were developed in only nine months. I challenge anyone to come up with an argument that convinces me that that is enough time. It’s impossible!