I want everyone to be aware of what is actually going on during these days of Covid-19. Physicians are being censored for voicing their concerns publically, which may differ from the MSM’s meme…”The vaccines are safe and effective.” Effectiveness is an easy one to strike down. Does the vaccine prevent infection? NO. Does the vaccine prevent transmission? NO. So that disinformation, that the vaccines are “safe and effective”, has been made crystal clear. Let’s also be clear what the actual definition of “disinformation” states:
“False information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.”
How interesting. We got 2 for 2. 1) Propaganda issued by a government organization and 2) propaganda issued by the media.
Having worked to support the brave critical care doctors at the FLCCC and their initially bootstrapped band of humanitarians, I know only too well the cost of courage during these times of a global pandemic… Losing one’s job, losing one’s license to practice medicine, losing one’s financial stability, losing one’s reputation, and the nightmare of hate, prejudice and anger in your face day in and day out, to name a few. I have asked myself many times, would I be willing to put my career, which I invested 4 years in a Ph.D. program, 4 internships, 1 year post doctoral supervision to sit for my licensing exam, and my current position (deep breath) , in the toilet and walk away when it was all over? I’m ashamed to say that, though I know clearly what I’d like to think I’d do, the fear might just be too great for me to endure it. Until I found myself in that position, it’s impossible to know for sure what I would do.
I’m writing this to all physicians, in the specialites that I defined, because I am so disillusioned by them in particular. These physicians have taken the path in medicine to focus their medical practice on the wellbeing of children and by extension, their moms. I understand that current physician practices rely almost exclusively on health insurance reimbursements, which puts them in a greater position of having to follow “the rules” i.e. the public health authorities protocols and mandates. Physicians must however, honor their Hippocratic oath - FIRST DO NO HARM. Given that prior to this pandemic, it took between 7-10 years to prove safety and efficacy enough to complete the approval process of a new, traditional vaccine, the public health authorities made the decision to eliminate traditional safety standards that had been in place for decades by offering Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) of new, gene therapy types of vaccines. Ultimately, after 2 months of post vaccination follow-up, they moved ahead with EUA approval. Had Pfizer been transparent regarding the clinical trial data, especially phase III trials, it would have been easy to see that serious safety signals had appeared. Additionally, once the vaccines had their EUA and were in the public domain, any physician could easily have checked VAERS and seen a dramatic uptick in adverse reactions. OR… one could simply follow orders. Wait, wasn’t that the explanation the Nazi’s gave during the Nuremberg Trial? To excuse their involvement in the murder of countless Jews and others? It didn’t work then and it certainly shouldn’t work now.
Let’s not forget, Dr. Pierre Kory gave testimony, at multiple Senate hearings early on in the pandemic, on highly effective early treatments with FDA approved off label medicines. Guess who either didn’t bother to show up or made inappropriate comments about Dr. Kory in their brief statements and then walked out before hearing any testimony? The democratic Senators I’m afraid. It’s as if simply hearing from a critical care expert, a fellow democrat I might add, would singe their ears.
So now we understand that information was available to any physician who took the time to investigate these new mRNA vaccines, and the impact they may have been having on their patients. Knowing that the very essence of EUA maintains that due to an emergency, there was insufficient time to adequately test the long term safety of vaccines or medicines. If one had bothered to explore this new technology, they would have quickly seen that ALL prior attempts to develop an mRNA vaccine had failed. Perhaps what angers me the most regarding physicians who followed along as sheep, spouting the public health narrative, is the reality that ALL specialities in medicine, be they oncology, cardiology, infectious disease, pulmonology, hematology, endocrinology, to name a few, ALL live by the belief that early treatment of ANY illness is BEST. If there is even 1 field of medicine that believes waiting on a pathogen or abnormality until it has progressed is most effective, please enlighten me. Why did countless PCPs tell their patients to take tylenol to treat their fever and pain but to wait until they couldn’t breath before heading to the hospital? Given all of that unfortunate reality, didn’t physicians have, at the very least, a moral obligation to provide informed consent to their patients? I do understand the dilemma they were faced with, as our public health agencies were very firm and definitive - “The vaccines are safe and effective.” We now understand that was an impossible conclusion to arrive at. Once it was painfully clear that the vaccines neither stopped infection nor transmission, might that have prompted them to speak out, or at the least begin to question things? Apparently that didn’t appear to make any difference I’m afraid.
Here’s a scenario that I believe each and every pediatrician and obstetrician had an ethical and moral obligation to engage with each patient prior to providing a Covid vaccination; below is an example of what might have happened in any medical practice in the U.S.
I want to provide you with information that I have discovered from my research which I believe would be helpful to you when trying to decide if you want to be vaccinated and/or to make the decision to vaccinate your child. What would follow would be ones review of the history of mRNA vaccines and the prior failures to develop a safe and effective mRNA vaccine. I would then explain about VAERS and what information that is providing for us. If one were to add up all of the VAERS reports on ALL prior vaccines combined, over the past 50 years, that number would be less than the reported adverse reactions reported within the first year of the Covid vaccines EUA roll out. One must also be compelled to explain that there’s an extremely high degree of failure to report adverse effects of medications and vaccines within the medical community (one Harvard healthcare system provider found that only 1 - 10% of all adverse events are reported to the VAERS system). I have personally spoken with numerous nurses over the last 2 years to inquire about their rate of reporting such findings. ALL said that they had never made a report to VAERS nor were they instructed to do so by their hospital/clinic/ or private practice physician in charge. In fact, many healthcare professionals hadn’t even heard of VAERS! I would also point out that there is a dramatic difference between the absolute risk and the relative risk, which is what’s more commonly given to the public. A clear explanation of the two types of risk analysis would be most informative. Additionally, it would behoove me to inform them that the risk for any healthy child to die from Covid-19 is extremely small - less than .01% while the risk of a serious adverse effect, including death, is substantially greater. I would also point out that safety data during pregnancy was NOT part of the clinical trial data. I also would provide information about the Great Barrington Declaration which has been signed by over 1 million people around the world who do not support the mandatory vaccination of any child, for Covid. I would then answer any questions they might have and explain that IF they still wanted to be vaccinated or have their child vaccinated, I would be happy to administer the vaccine to them. This private discussion between patient and doctor shouldn’t in any way threaten one’s reputation or license. All physicians are in fact legally required to provide informed consent for most treatments. I believe this simple explanation of the obvious and avoidable risks of the Covid-19 vaccines would fulfill one’s responsibility as a licensed physician.
There has been one troublesome insight that I have come to appreciate. The truth is that what has been mandated and what the actual science reveals is literally unbelievable. Let me say that again. The truth is unbelievable. Who would have imaged that our public health agencies would put pharmaceutical profits over human lives? Who would have thought that in order to promote the EUA of shiny new mRNA vaccines, our government would not allow safe, effective, evidence based early treatments, using off label medications, to see the light of day. Inherent in an EUA is the requirement that no treatments are currently available to protect the public. That couldn’t be further from the truth.
I had learned, early in the pandemic, that a physician colleague of my husband’s had been hired by Congress to consult on Covid. To say that we were relieved that someone whom we trusted was at the right place, at the right time would be an understatement. We sent this person all the supporting research and eagerly awaited an email response which came about a week later: “There is a pervasive problem on the Hill with how we prove the value of a low cost treatment.” There was no acknowledgment or questioning of the science or the research. It was simply stated that it would be impossible to convince those in Congress to take a position against Big Pharma who, most of us know, have lobbied each and every member of Congress while providing financial support to their campaigns. As horrifying as that conclusion was, we were still hopeful that this well respected physician would sound the alarm and do everything in their power to support the early treatment findings. That didn’t happen. I encouraged this physician to become a whistleblower, pointing out the millions of lives such action would save but our pleas were met with silence. We never heard anything back. I wonder what the children and grandchildren of this physician will think when asked what was done to protect the American people from Covid. The truth is, all we got back was silence, which led to the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in this country alone. It has been estimated that if early treatment with safe and effective, evidence-based off-label medications had been deployed to each and every household in the country, approximately 75% of lives that were lost could have been prevented.
Months ago, the AMA stepped in to threaten the license of any physician who wouldn’t blindly follow the public health directives. How horrifying is that? Where was the AMA when countless people were taking unethically prescribed opioids? Where was the FDA, whose job it was to protect the public from harm? It took private attorneys to stand up to Big Pharma in order to finally take legal action against them. The same story holds true for the tobacco industry. Our government failed to do their job, rather they turned a blind eye toward this hideous threat to the health of Americans. And what about the Board of Pharmacists who took a strong position against ivermectin, one of the safest drugs in the world. They actually interfered in the practice of medicine by refusing to fill prescriptions of ivermectin, written by licensed physicians, forcing many to utilize veterinary forms of this remarkable prize winning medicine. Why isn’t everyone screaming about this injustice? Why are physicians sitting silently while their ability to practice medicine is insidiously being taken away from them should they fail to go along with the ever present propagandized meme…. “the vaccines are safe and effective”.
Steve Kirsch wrote an excellent post last week where he shared an insightful quotation from Carl Sagan:
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: if we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” Carl Sagan - The Demon-Haunted World: Science As A Candle In The Dark.
What we’ve learned from our history is that if we fail to learn important lessons that we’ve been given, we are doomed to repeat them. God help us all.
Outstanding article. Remedying the damage done to us by this fraud requires talents like you who can relate the medical ethics issues to the people with the soft and simple touch of a child psychiatrist.
I don’t know anything about psychology, but the trauma of realizing the truth will be off the charts.
As absurd as it may sound, COVID-19 was a fraud on the public.
Consider the two pillars of the COVID-19 pandemic: 1) Lethality, 2) Asymptomatic spread.
* Fauci lied to congress about SarsCOV2 being 10x more lethal than seasonal influenza.
* Fauci lied about having evidence of asymptomatic spread based on a "report from Germany." That 'report' was based on rumors about one (1) allegedly asymptomatic woman from China spreading the virus to 16 contacts in Germany. I say “rumors,” because … "the researchers didn't actually speak to the woman before they published the paper."
Hanlon’s razor states that one should “never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.” Cut Hanlon's razor. Think back on everything they told us while presuming malice.
Without the lethality and asymptomatic spread, you don’t have a pandemic.
How do you make a severe influenza virus look like a global pandemic in order to push your financial and political agendas? Spread it into the communal living arrangements of nursing homes and withhold early treatments that result in 75% of all deaths... while changing death certificate protocols to make every death a COVID death.
What happens when the world wakes up and realizes the truth of what you’re saying? I asked this question a few months before in the context of waking people up by proving they killed the nursing home residents; which is easier than you think.
What’s the best way to soften the blow; as a child psychiatrist would for a child? Am I wrong in thinking that when this all comes to light that the entire world will have suffered something along the lines of familial rape trauma? (Betrayal Trauma Theory)? That's where my intuition leads. I wish I knew more about psychology to better articulate the issue. Sorry about that chief.
Anyway, love your writing.
Stay in your own movie,
Bob Stone
You would think that after two years of this nonsense and seeing the failure, we would want to do better. It seems otherwise. Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, MD, is one of the people trying to push back against new proposed laws for California. I mention this as his concerns match neatly with yours (and mine).
If the new laws are passed, he notes:
##
Californians would live under a regime that allows: (1) the state to force on children medical interventions that are not FDA approved, (2) the state to muzzle the speech of physicians and decide which interpretations of scientific or medical evidence are correct, (4) the state to censor online information it does not like (4) the state to act as surrogate parents for 12-year-old children who are not yet cognitively and emotionally capable of giving free and informed consent to medical decisions that have potential lifelong ramifications, and (5) the state and its agents to access your personal medical records without your consent.
##
https://aaronkheriaty.substack.com/p/the-tip-of-the-spear
And there's more.
Basically, the doctor / patient relationship is gone. A medical doctor, even if in private practice, is an instrument of the state; the patient, a subject.
If people wait to act they will soon have no opportunity to act -- no agency. Below are two of the proposed laws:
##
AB 2098: classifies any medical opinion that runs contrary to the establishment’s covid narrative as “misinformation” and subjects physicians expressing such views to charge of “unprofessional conduct” which is subject to discipline by the medical licensing board.
SB 920: authorizes medical board to inspect a doctor’s office and medical records without patients’ consent.
##
The critical inquiry which science and clinical care require is now “misinformation” and potentially "unprofessional conduct.”
Your private medical records, 4th Amendment rights be damned, are subject to inspection at the state's whim.
What nation are citizens and residents of the USA living in? I'm having trouble recognizing it.