Let's Not Miss This Opportunity

I have a confession to make. When I first started hearing about issues surrounding the safety of all vaccines, I thought perhaps this wasn’t going to benefit the Covid related issues associated with mRNA injections. I thought it might actually muddy the waters for our cause in attempting to halt the EUA injections. I believed this new gene therapy was so different than traditional vaccines that it would take the attention away from my mission. Truth is, I got it wrong.

I have come to understand that this very issue, the actual questioning of the safety of all vaccines, is something that didn’t begin with the pandemic. As a liberal democrat for over 50 years, I never really questioned the childhood vaccination schedule nor the belief that our public health agencies, who were mandated to protect the public, might in fact be captured by the very industry they were meant to regulate. I believed the dangerous and erroneous myth that our public health agencies represented the gold standard of public health agencies around the globe. That conclusion has been instrumental in blinding the vast majority of democrats from fully understanding what has been happening during the pandemic regarding vaccines, as well as the fact that our entire safe and effective childhood vaccine program is actually a house of cards.

My introduction to the hazards of vaccines came over a year ago. Dr. Pierre Kory was the person who recommended to me that I read Bobby Kennedy’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci. I had a pretty strong reaction to that suggestion actually. I said I’m not comfortable supporting a person who is clearly an anti-vaxxer and would therefore not be purchasing his book. Although I remember the wonderful environmental work that he had done, I was convinced by the MSM that he had moved into the dangerous territory of casting aspersions on all vaccines and, without conscious thought, I had thrown him under the bus in my mind. Their propaganda was that good. Pierre continued to encourage me to read it and, given my considerable respect for him, I reluctantly agreed to read the book. That was when I realized that Kennedy wasn’t actually an anti-vaxxer. Instead, I learned that his only crime was that he had started to strongly and consistently request all data regarding the safety of vaccines from both the pharmaceutical industry and our government. The bottom line was, since there wasn’t any accurate data on the safety of vaccines, propaganda or disinformation was created to turn the public against him. Dr. Andrew Wakefield revealed the reality of the absence of safety data on childhood vaccines over a decade earlier, which cost him his reputation, his license to practice medicine and his multiple board certifications. The new book Turtles All The Way Down provided the definitive proof of that missing, critically necessary data. I think it’s so important that we all understand the play book that has been expertly crafted and implemented to deceive the public. Since the pharmaceutical industry cannot present any true scientific data on the safety of any childhood vaccines, they turn to propaganda and disinformation. By attacking any physician, researcher or scientist who actually is trying to shine a light on this horrifying omission of safety data, they can successfully steer the public away from these so called charlatans. Slap an anti-vax label on them and it’s a done deal. When you combine the essential trust we’ve been groomed to accept about our public health agencies and wordsmithing a derogatory phrase, such as “anti-vaxxer”, you’ve got a powerful combination that has effectively stopped the needed investigation into the safety of vaccines. Doctors have gotten the message loud and clear. If you challenge the powers that be, you’ll lose your reputation, your medical license, your board certifications and your financial livelihood. Case closed. Silence to follow.

I think it’s important for everyone to read at least a section of the Turtles book, in order to gain an important understanding into the problem. Given the reluctance of the general population to question vaccines, it’s helpful to take a different tactic on this topic by buying into the narrative. Turtles does an exceptional job of that by providing a section which they call “If vaccines were safe”. I believe it would be invaluable to ask these questions to our reluctant friends, neighbors and family members because it brings to mind important questions that can easily be asked:

What if the health establishment were actually right about vaccine safety? What if common vaccine side effects were indeed mild and transient and severe vaccine injury as rare as “one in a million”?

If vaccines did not cause serious adverse effects, as we are repeatedly told, then there would be no rational reason to give control groups in pre-licensure clinical trials another vaccine, as is the current norm. Administering a placebo ( saline solution) to the control group in a clinical trial is superior in every relevant aspect: NOT only is it cheaper and simpler than using another vaccine, it also provides reliable background rates for both efficacy and safety. Furthermore, there would also be no rationale for giving a control group the vaccine-sans-antigen in a vaccine trial. Why needlessly risk infants by using a compound that has zero potential benefit and an unknown safety profile, which a safe alternative ( placebo) is readily available? Why breach basic tenets of medical science ethics for no reason? If the vaccine on trial was expected to have only mild side effects, then what possible reason could there be for employing such a procedure?

If vaccines were indeed safe, it wouldn’t make sense to waste valuable resources on building and maintaining a computerized system for reporting adverse events of vaccines with inherent defects, well-known to all concerned, that cancel out most its theoretical benefits. In a world where vaccines were safe, authorities would establish an active system with mandatory reporting by medical personnel, similar to infectious disease reporting systems that have existed in Western countries for decades. Such a system would provide valuable estimates of the actual (presumably low) rates of vaccine side effects. This, in turn, would confirm the excellent safety profile obtained in clinical trials, and would further bolster public confidence in the vaccine program.

If vaccines were safe, vaccine-safety research would be conducted unreservedly, including physiological studies exploring potential links between vaccines and subsequent adverse health events. Thus, those rare cases of suspected vaccine injury would receive comprehensive and in-depth medical investigations…….

Assuming that vaccines were safe, epidemiological safety studies would not be publicly presented as “conclusive proof”, but as they really are - methodologically limited and potentially biased instruments that can neither confirm nor refute a causal link between vaccination and potential side effects. The scientific community would not shy away from discussing the merits ( or lack thereof) of these studies, and bad ones would be criticized appropriately.

If vaccines were indeed safe, health authorities would be happy to meet parents’ growing demand for comprehensive and frequent epidemiological studies examining the overall benefits of the vaccine program and its impact on the incidence of various chronic health conditions. Vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies would surely top the establishment’s priority list, as the results of these studies would likely confirm the safety of vaccines and pacify the concerned parents.

In the real world, vaccine science is run very differently… The clinical trials are “cooked; adverse event reporting systems are rudimentary by design; biomedical research into vaccine injury is virtually nonexistent; health authorities sponsor biased epidemiological studies, conducted by researchers with huge conflicts of interest; studies evaluating the true benefit of the vaccination program are never done and neither are studies comparing the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations; and key vaccination guidelines are not based on sound science.

I believe these are all thoughtful questions that we can ask our democratic friends to consider. Although not a direct challenge to the safety of vaccines, it poses some intuitive questions that cannot be easily denied. Another important question one might ask is why the public health agencies have refused to have any open, scientific debates about vaccine safety or why they’ve been unable to provide any scientific data regarding the safety of all vaccines? Both would certainly help to eliminate any parental hesitation to get their children vaccinated.

I have to admit to being very disillusioned and angry with all physicians in this country over the last two years. I felt strongly that each and every one of them failed to protect their patients by neglecting to investigate the clinical trial data from Pfizer. When a company attempts to block the release of their clinical trial data for 75 years, it doesn’t take a genius to question why that might be reflective of a serious problem. Shouldn’t that have encouraged physicians to do a deep dive into the data? What I’ve come to understand, however, is that our primary care doctors, and physicians in general, are neither scientists nor researchers. They have never studied how to design nor even how to evaluate research. What they did receive, since medical school, was the unimpeachable belief that the CDC was truly the gold standard of public health. They learned to trust them unequivocally so when their guidance assured them that the mRNA injections, as well as all childhood vaccines, were both safe and effective, their intuitive sense was not to even question those conclusions. In addition, they had neither the time nor interest to delve into researching the data. Ultimately, they were lied to as well, which has been the case for the last 20 years regarding the safety of all vaccines. Vaccines are huge money makers for Big Pharma and any efforts to stop that vast and consistent flow of money needed to be stopped immediately. They have become masters at doing so.

Here’s the bottom line from my way of thinking. If one good thing can come from this nightmare of the Covid pandemic, it can be that we finally investigate the harm that has happened to our children. Despite spending more of our tax dollars on health care than any country in the world, we have some of the poorest health care outcomes of any country. Talk about a pandemic. As our childhood schedule of vaccines increases, our children are becoming sicker and sicker. Think back to when you were in elementary school. Do you remember seeing kids with autism, cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease and other chronic health conditions? I certainly don’t. I understand that today, the risk of your child being diagnosed with autism is 1 in 25. How is that even possible? How could we have allowed that to happen without demanding answers?

I do believe young parents are finally catching on however which can be seen in the extremely low rate of vaccination for Covid and the increasing numbers of parents who are not blindly following the recommendations for all childhood vaccinations. Here’s an interesting loophole that allows our public health agencies to be free from prosecution however. The CDC states that the childhood vaccine schedule is merely their “recommendation”, which clearly states that the vaccinations aren’t mandatory. The reality of that misleading statement is that every public school in the country takes the next step by requiring or mandating those vaccines for entry into the public school system. Can we make changes state by state regarding those entry requirements? Yes we can, but the challenge to do so will be enormous, given the propaganda that we’ve all been subjected to. What would most likely happen in that scenario is that republican states would allow for any exemptions to those rules while democratic leaning states will continue to mandate the vaccines for public school admission. So the health of one’s child will depend upon where their family lives. I don’t believe that’s a viable solution. We must challenge this disinformation and finally provide the public and our medical doctors with unequivocal safety data.

We can send a spaceship to Mars, we can blast a meteor out of its path but we can’t seem to be able to research the safety of vaccines? Talk about unbelievable. We are living in the twilight zone my friends. Let’s all wake up to the truth and stop this travesty that has been happening to our children. Isn’t it our jobs as parents to protect our children? Shouldn’t it be a requirement to have unbiased scientific studies to determine the safety of individual vaccines AND vaccines that are given in combination? Anything short of that prevents us from knowing the truth about what is harming our country’s youngest citizens.

I thought when we had to live through the Sandy Hook mass shooting of 20 children, we would certainly be able to stop the purchase of automatic weapons. That didn’t happen. During that frightening time, polls of the general population confirmed that close to 80% of the country supported a ban on assault weapons. That confirms for me that we can’t trust Congress to put the best interest of our children first and foremost. Today our children are getting increasingly sick with chronic condition in numbers never before seen. Are we going to sit by and allow that to continue? Don’t we have a right to know if the vaccines are safe? Is it unreasonable to demand safety studies being done by qualified, experienced researchers who have no conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry or our captured public health agencies? I believe that should be the easiest question to answer.