Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michelle Rabin Ph. D.'s avatar

I would like to share some encouraging news that I got this morning, in an email from The World Council for Health. I hope those interested will follow this courageous group as they fight for our medical freedoms. Here's parts of her email this morning. They've been working diligently to try to prevent the WHO from global controll of our health going forward....a horrifying possibility for sure.

"If the WHO thought it could quietly let its public participation process slip past your attention, it was mistaken. (If you’re not sure what the pandemic treaty is all about, you can read my post about it here.) For my substack readers - you'll need to go directly to their site for details

As mentioned previously, the WHO gave just five days for people to submit their views on its proposed pandemic treaty. Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organisations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people.

Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day, presumably as a result of too much traffic. One person who quite understandably missed the deadline is Professor Robert Clancy, Australia’s leading Clinical Immunologist. He sent me the comment he’d wanted to submit and has agreed to let me share it with you. Have a read, and then I’ll share with you some good news:

“The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society.

I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarised view by Dr Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors. Certainly, those who have closely monitored control of the Covid Pandemic, and have been largely disenfranchised by bureaucratic decision makers, with little to no understanding of the disease and critical issues modulating clinical outcomes. The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programmes, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO.

My fears regarding the WHO taking the mantle regarding pandemic control start with those issues identified by Tess Lawrie. It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterised by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process – the need for local decision making is of prime importance. The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes – supported by the WHO – must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.

I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship’.

Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”

I know that, like Professor Clancy, many of you didn’t get a chance to make your voice heard. Well, the good news is, we have another opportunity. According to the WHO, the next round of written and video public participation in the pandemic treaty will take place on 16-17 June.

Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly. Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.

There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognise the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power. We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World's People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.

So yes, we will continue to push back and challenge and say no. But we refuse to let our time and energy be absorbed by just the fight. Rather, we’ll continue to co-create a better way for our beautiful world and its inhabitants: with our partners, our allies and with you."

We have a true warrior in Dr. Lawrie. She's the real deal. My hope is that her organization can actually replace the WHO. A HUGE challenge if there ever was one but the world would be an entirely different place if they were able to accomplish that. Imagine a health care system that actually put the health needs of each person as a top priority. Imagine an organization that had no conflicts of interest, whose only agenda was to support the well being of everyone around the world....literally true HEALTH CARE.

Expand full comment
Stop Having Kids's avatar

The best thing you can do is accept the reality because acceptance is liberating. You have to accept what you can see, hear, and know is true. You don't have to tolerate it, but acceptance I think is key and it'll help you be less debilitated in day-to-day life. It's a lot to accept though and a very heavy and disturbing reality to live with. The people who orchestrated this sadistic mess know human beings well and they knew they could get away with such a massive scam and democide. There have been so many experiments on humans to the point where they understand how to implement mind control on the masses for anything and most humans have the quality about themselves where they aren't open to new information and changing their mind. Humans by and large don't have integrity, ethics, and they'd rather keep believing something than change their mind and admit they were wrong. It's really strange and frightening. Look at this quote from a eugenicist book in 1981 and tell me this isn't exactly what we are living through right now: https://www.changeexchangehealth.com/post/the-future-will-be-about-finding-a-way-to-reduce-the-population-jacques-attali

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts